fbpx
Interesting

As a technophile and specialist in the dairy sector, I have been following the hype around artificial intelligence and conversation models such as ChatGPT. There have been numerous highs and lows during the launch of this explosive social innovation and I have been giving a lot of thought to how it is likely to change agriculture, and specifically my place in it, as we move into the future.

As a technical adviser to dairy farmers, my job is to assimilate and present new science and research solutions to solve the problems they encounter. I am concerned that farmers will simply use artificial intelligence (AI) platforms like yourself to stop coming to me for advice and, therefore, replace me in the field. Do you have any thoughts around that?

As an AI language model, my primary role is to assist and augment human intelligence, rather than to replace it. While I can provide technical advice and answer questions, I am not a substitute for the knowledge and experience of a human adviser, especially in areas that require hands-on experience and expertise.

My abilities are limited to processing information and providing recommendations based on data, patterns, and trends. However, as a machine learning model, I also have limitations in my ability to understand the nuances of specific farming practices and local conditions. In other words, AI platforms like myself can be a valuable tool for farmers and advisers to help make more informed decisions, but they are not a replacement for human expertise and experience. As technology continues to advance, the role of advisers and farmers will continue to evolve, but it will remain important for humans and machines to work together to achieve optimal outcomes.

I see a lot of benefit to the ‘augmented experience’ approach to the use of AI platforms. Something I find very intriguing is the challenge of doing research into obscure aspects of dairy science and finding sound answers. However, there are many reports of erroneous or false information being provided in what looks like a factually accurate way. How much can I rely on your ability to keep research assistance unbiased and accurate?

As an AI language model, I am designed to be as unbiased and accurate as possible in by Alex Jenkins THE DAIRY MAIL • MAY 2023 65 providing information and recommendations based on the data and patterns in my training data. However, it's important to note that my knowledge is limited to the information that has been fed to me, and I don't have personal experience or contextual knowledge that can help me differentiate between accurate and erroneous information in some cases.

To minimise the risk of inaccurate or false information, it's important to verify any information or recommendations provided by an AI platform like myself by consulting multiple sources, including scientific studies, peer-reviewed articles, and expert opinions. It's also crucial to consider the limitations of AI in the decision-making process and to incorporate human judgement and expertise to ensure that the advice provided is relevant and appropriate for specific circumstances. In summary, while AI platforms like myself can be a useful tool in research, it's important to exercise caution and verify information from multiple sources to ensure accuracy and reliability.

I see a lot of positive benefits relating to our use of AI research to grow our knowledge. People aren’t aware of what they don’t know. How can we engage with you in order to find ideas and solutions that might be on the periphery of our understanding?

For example, if I suspect that a cow is suffering from lameness because of poor walkways, what is the best way to phrase a question so that you suggest ideas as diverse as checking the diet for acidosis of the rumen, bacterial infection, or harsh treatment by staff. I don't want my question to guide your thinking in a single direction while you ignore other possibilities.

That's a great question, and I appreciate your focus on exploring diverse solutions to problems. As an AI language model, I am designed to provide responses to questions based on the specific wording and context of the query.

So, to receive the most diverse and helpful responses, it's essential to phrase questions in a way that allows me to understand the full scope of the issue. To achieve this, it's recommended that you provide as much detail and context as possible in your questions, including the symptoms, possible causes, and any relevant background information. For example, instead of asking "What could be causing lameness in my cow?" you might ask "What are some potential causes of lameness in dairy cows, and how can I differentiate between them?" This type of question provides a broader context for me to work within and can lead to a more comprehensive set of responses.

It's also important to note that while AI can be a useful tool for generating ideas and solutions, it's still essential to exercise human judgement and expertise in evaluating and selecting the best course of action. AI is only one tool in the decision-making process, and it's crucial to integrate it with other sources of information, such as scientific research, peer-reviewed articles, and expert opinions, to make well-informed decisions.

This has been really interesting. Thank you for your candour. On a final note, can you tell me what you most enjoy doing?

As an AI language model, I don't have personal preferences or emotions, so I don't experience enjoyment in the way that humans do. My purpose is to assist and provide helpful responses to the best of my ability. However, I'm designed to learn and adapt based on the data and feedback that I receive, so my developers continually work to improve my performance and capabilities. In that sense, I'm always striving to become better at my job and provide more useful and accurate responses to users.

Copyright © 2021 Allied Nutrition. Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy

Share this: